Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27595/2025bail granted

Navin Kumar @ Naveen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27595 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- Excise Mashrakh District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Navin Kumar @ Naveen Kumar son of Pawan Rai R/o Village -Salempur (Dumariya), P.S-. Goroul District- Vaishali 2.

Vipin Kumar @ Bipin Kumar son of Late Ravindra Rai R/o Village -Salempur (Dumariya), P.S-. Goroul District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Mashrakh Excise P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 dated 28.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 70.200 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27595 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 sprung up in this case on mere suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners are not the owner of the seized vehicle. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged vehicle. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 01.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran in connection with Mashrakh Excise P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T