Sanjeev Ranjan v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42264 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Sanjeev Ranjan Son of Late Acharya Gridhari Shastri, resident of 'Zee Ghar', Tahir Lane, Road No- 16, Police Station- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Tripti Bharti, wife of Shri Sanjeev Ranjan and Daughter of Devender Prasad, resident of Arya Nagar, Motichowk, Post & Police Station- Khagaul, DistrictPatna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lal Babu Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42264 of 2017(2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Complaint case No.77C of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T