← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33212/2024bail granted

Sandeep Kumar Yadav @ Sandeep Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33212 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2023 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Sandeep Kumar Yadav @ Sandeep Yadav Son of Sikender Yadav Resident of Rajwahi, Ward No. 11, P.O.- Rajwahi, P.S.- Jadopur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar-841428 2.

Radheshyam Yadav Son of Shivbalak Yadav Resident of Village- Shampur Kotarha (Baijubhagat Ke Tola), P.S.- Nautan, Dist.- West Champaran at Bettiah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devashish Giri For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is a person with clean antecedent and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 129.6 litres of liquor from a place near bank of a river. It is next submitted that petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioners and is accessible to public at large and they came to be implicated based on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33212 of 2024(2) dt.08-05-2024 2/2 confessional statement of Upendra Yadav in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jadopur P.S. Case No.219/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of even one case and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T