Manmohan Jha v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19214 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Manmohan Jha son of Late Bhagwan Dutta Jha resident of village Orahara, P.S. Rajaun, District Banka at present residing at Road No. 1D, New Patliputra Colony, P.S. Patliputra, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi.

2. The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi.

3. The General Manager, Eastern Railway, Kolkata (West Bengal).

4. The DRM, Malda Division, Eastern Railway, Malda (West Bengal).

5. The ADRM, Malda Division, Eastern Railway, Malda (West Bengal).

6. The Divisional Engineer II, Bhagalpur Railway Division, Bhagalpur.

7. The Senior Section Engineer, Rail, Bhagalpur.

8. The State of Bihar through the Collector, Banka, District - Banka.

9. The Sub Divisional Officer, Banka, District Banka.

10. The Circle Officer, Rajaun, District Banka. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kesari- Aag11 For the Railways : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, S.C. Railway ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 14-03-2016 Heard Mr. Sandeep Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshri, learned Additional Advocate General No.11, appearing on behalf of the Staterespondents. Heard also Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Railways. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to take recourse to

Patna High Court CWJC No.19214 of 2015 (2) dt.14-03-2016 2/2 appropriate provisions of law.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law including, if so advised, institute appropriate suit in a Court of competent jurisdiction.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Mkr./- U