Tunnu Kumar @ Nandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28136 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-990 Year-2019 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Tunnu Kumar @ Nandan Kumar S/o Pramod Singh R/o Village - Sahwajpur, P.S - Jehanabad (Kalpa), District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-07-2026 Heard Mr.Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Jehanabad (Kalpa) P.S. Case No. 990 of 2019 instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 380, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 28.11.2019 by the informant, Ganesh Yadav.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 27.11.2019 while he alongwith his mother was sleeping, the accused persons entered which included this petitioner with pistol in his hand and later, the allegation is that they are not vacating the land, Dharmendra Kumar opened fire from the pistol hitting on the cheek while Tunnu fired which hit back of the mother who died on the spot. He anyhow managed to escape
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28136 of 2026(4) dt.17-07-2026 2/2 and noticed five motorcycles present at the spot. This led to the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the investigation, his location of the petitioner has been found to be elsewhere (Rohtas) and not at the place of occurrence and this delayed the investigation.
5. Learned APP on the other opposes the prayer submitting that he is one of the main culprit and has moved this Court after seven years and the case diary shows that the police repeatedly visiting his place but without success.
6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the role that has been assigned to the petitioner, no relief can be extended.
7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
8. If the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T