Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30606/2022dismissed

Mithun Kumar @ Aditya Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-08Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30606 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2021 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== MITHUN KUMAR @ ADITYA KUMAR YADAV Son of Sanjay Yadav Resident of village - Khajuri, P.S.- Bhargama, District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No.196 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 393 and 398 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner along with other co-accused persons are said to have looted away cash and mobile of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that one co-accused person was apprehended at the spot and he disclosed the name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30606 of 2022(2) dt.08-09-2022 2/2 petitioner and on that basis the petitioner has been made accused in the present case. It is submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T