Munna Singh @ Langra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25618 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2020 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== MUNNA SINGH @ LANGRA, Son of Dhaneshvar Singh, Resident of Village- Kathatar, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prameshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings. Since the physical court proceeding is non-functional, due to present pandemic, COVID-19, the matter is listed with defects.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within three weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(2)/13/27A of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegation is recovery of 3.8 Kg. of Ganja from the bag of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and he has been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25618 of 2020(2) dt.30-09-2020 2/2 this case with false allegation. Only on the basis of suspicion petitioner was arrested and he is in custody since 28.01.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail petition and submits that the bail application of the similarly situated co-accused has been rejected by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.06.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No.18957 of 2020.

In view of recovery of 3.8 Kg. of Ganja from the conscious possession of the petitioner which is more than small quantity but much less than the commercial quantity, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 22/2020 from the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabhua.

The application is dismissed accordingly.

However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after one year of custody.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T