Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Sharma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24832 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -129 Year- 2017 Thana -HULASGANJ District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. SANJAY SINGH @ SANJAY SHARMA Son of Bachan Singh
2. Sachin Kumar @ Jalim Singh, Son of Uma Singh Both Resident of Village-Kewla, P.S. Hulasganj, District-Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party : Mr. Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard.
The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Hulasganj P.S.Case No.129 of 2017 registered for an offence under Sections 147, 148, 385 and 387 of the IPC as also the Arms Act.
It has been submitted that there is absolutely no material against the petitioners. The learned counsel has referred the order of the court below wherein the court below has stated that in the case diary at paras-2, 12, 13, 14 and 15, the informant and witnesses have supported the prosecution case but the I.O. has not mentioned the name of the villagers who disclosed the name of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24832 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 these petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent. The learned APP opposed the submissions.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K.Rajak, Sub Judge-IV, Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj P.S.Case No.129 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T