← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32497/2024bail granted

Sagar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-01Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32497 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2024 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Sagar Mandal Son Of Late Arjun Mandal Resident Of Village- Harinagar Ward No. 07, Psd- Bahadurganj,Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahadurganj PS Case No. 53 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 17(a), 18(a), 21(a) & 29 of the NDPS Act. 3.

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of 17. 46 grams of smack has been recovered from beneath the cot.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32497 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 further submits petitioner has no concern with the recovered contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 07-032024, and has got three criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bahardurganj PS Case No. 53 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T