Sachin Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25916 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2023 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sachin Kumar Yadav Son of Rajdev Rai Resident of village - Angarghat, Police Station - Angarghat, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per F.I.R., the informant alleged that on secret information that one Santosh Kumar @ Guddu and his associates are visiting Mathematics Point Coaching Centre for the purpose of taking contract for manipulating in the Staff Selection Commission Exam, he raided the place and arrested Santosh Kumar & other co-accused persons and on search, electronic equipments, mobiles and admit cards of candidates were recovered. Accordingly, the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25916 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 name of the petitioner surfaced on the confessional statement of co-accused Santosh @ Guddu, who was arrested by police, and save & except confession, there is nothing against this petitioner. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused Mukesh Kumar has already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 12.03.2024 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 13879 of 2024. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 387 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Saif/- U T