Patna High CourtCWJC/25286/2013dfd for non appearance

Manoj Kumar v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And ORS

2023-09-04Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25286 of 2013 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son Of Sri Baidyanath Prasad, Resident Of VillageAhwarsheikh, P.O. Ahwarsheikh, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., having its registered office at Bharat Bhawan, 4 and 6, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Post Box No. 588, Mumbai- 40001 through The General Manager.

Senior Regional Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., having its Office at Ashiana Chamber (3rd Floor) Exhibition Road, P.B. No. 20, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna 3.

Territory Manager (Retail), Barauni Territory, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., N.H. 31, at and P.O. Papraur, District- Begusarai, Bihar. 4.

State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna 5.

District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah 6.

Sub-Divisional Officer, Bettiah Sadar, Bettiah, District- West Champaran 7.

Circle Officer, Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. 8.

Arsia Naz, daughter of Syed Nisar Ahmad, resident of Village Ahwar Sheikh, P.O. Alamganj Bazar, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the State :

Mr. Radhwanand, GA-11 with Mr. Rajnish Shandilya, AC to GA-11.

For the BPCL :

Mr. Sanjay Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rudrank Shivam Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 04-09-2023 Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The matter was earlier listed on 24.08.2023, on which date there was also no representation on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.25286 of 2013(5) dt.04-09-2023 2/2 petitioner.

3. Today the matter is listed under the heading "For Orders" but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition.

5. The present writ petition, accordingly, dismissed for default.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) shakir/- U