← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6175/2023disposed

Anita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-09Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6175 of 2023 ====================================================== Anita Devi Wife of Late Pramod Kumar Mishra Resident of Adarsh Nagar, New Area, Ward no.12, P.O. and P.S. Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secreary, Department of Panchayati Raj Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secrertary, Department of Panchayati Raj Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

4.

The Disrict Panchayat Raj Officer, Aurangabad. 5.

The District Deputy Collector (Establishment), Aurangabad. 6.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Deo District Aurangabad. 8.

The Block Developemnt Officer, Navinagar, District-Aurangabad. 9.

The Account General . Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sri Krishna Ranjan, Advocate For the AG (Bihar) :

Mr.Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay ( GA 5 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2023 Heard Mr. Sri Krishna Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, learned counsel for the Accountant General (Bihar) and Mr. Ajay, learned GA 5 for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to file a detail representation before the District Magistrate, Aurangabad for disposal of the claim of the petitioner, as made in the preset writ petition, in terms of

Patna High Court CWJC No.6175 of 2023(2) dt.09-08-2023 2/2 judgment dated 07.07.2020 passed in CWJC No.20072 of 2019.

3. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the District Magistrate, Aurangabad is directed to pass reasoned order in case the relief(s), as sought for in the present petition, is identical to that of Most. Ramsigari Devi. In case the petitioner is entitled for similar relief, the District Magistrate, Aurangabad is required to give identical benefits, in terms of judgment dated 07.07.2020 passed in CWJC No.20072 of 2019 (Most. Ramsigari Devi Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and the dues in accordance with law.

5. With the above observation/direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U