Adnan Karimi @ Advan Karim v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28700 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2025 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Adnan Karimi @ Advan Karim S/o Nasar Hassan R/o Vill- Abgila Muffassil, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate Mr. Hafiz Shahbaz Arif, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 349 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant with butt of pistol and lathi and co-accused Parvej Alam fired upon him and the shot hit him in chest. Thereafter, the petitioner and two other co-accused persons also fired upon the informant with their pistols but the shot missed the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28700 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/3 case. The present case is counter blast of Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 350 of 2025 which has been instituted by co-accused Md. Parvej Alam as the informant and some other persons assaulted him and the present informant fired upon him. Learned counsel further submits that there is land dispute between two groups and prior to lodging of these two cases, Circle Officer, Manpur has instituted Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 348 of 2025 against the persons of both sides but the petitioner has not been named in the said FIR.
Learned counsel further submits that the injury report of the informant falsifies the allegation made against the petitioner and other co-accused persons as no firearm injury has been found upon the informant and the injuries are only laceration and abrasion and both the injuries have been caused by hard and blunt object and the injuries are quite simple. Learned counsel further submits that even for causing injury by butt of pistol and lathi allegation has been made against a number of co-accused persons and not only against the petitioner, who has got clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28700 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 3/3 case and counter version in the background of land dispute and possibility of false implication along with clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Gaya/concerned court in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 349 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions : (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T