Badal Kumar @ Badal Muni @ Badal Kumar Muni v. The State Of Bihar

N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27310 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2025 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Badal Kumar @ Badal Muni @ Badal Kumar Muni Son of Sunil Muni Resident of Village - Chanda, Ward No. - 03, P.S. - Chausa, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025 instituted on 22.04.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 103(1) of B.N.S. which is pending in the court of S.D.J.M., Madhepura.

3. Prosecution case in short, is that the informant submitted a written report on 22.04.2025 before the S.H.O. of Chausa Police Station, stating therein that the deceased was the daughter of the informant and she was married with the accused-petitioner about two years ago. The informant alleged that after the marriage, the deceased was subjected to quarrels and physical assaulted by the petitioner and 2-3 days prior to the occurrence, a specific quarrel had taken place between the petitioner and the deceased. As per the informant, she had

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27310 of 2026(4) dt.21-07-2026 2/2 received information that the petitioner killed the deceased by slitting her neck.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is quite innocent and falsely been implicated in the present case. The counsel also submitted that charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2025 and has clean criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard the parties and perused thepostmortem report, from the post-mortem report it is quite clear that the death of the deceased is due to antemortem caused by sharp object. In view of the above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby rejected.

8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Alok Kumar, J) Anand/- U T