Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29853 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son Of Umakant Rai Resindent Of Village- Katholiya Maniyarpur, Ps- Bidupur, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 419, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 10 of the Bihar Examination Act, 1982.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that on the alleged date, co-accused Shiv Kumar was caught sitting in place of this petitioner as a candidate in the C.T.E.T. Examination and he was found in possession of the mark-sheet, Aadhar Card and other documents of this petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. It is further submitted that this petitioner was not present at the time, date and place of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29853 of 2024(3) dt.01-07-2024 2/2 occurrence. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that the certificates and documents of this petitioner were found in possession of co-accused Shiv Kumar.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T