Sanjay Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27117 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2017 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== SANJAY SAW Son of Krishna Saw, Resident of Village-Malshari, P.S.- Tekari, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Tekari (Panchanpur) P.S. Case No. 375 of 2017 registered for offence punishable under section 30(a) (c) (d) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016. It has been alleged that ten litres of illegal liquor has been recovered from the bank of river and the name of this petitioner has come on confessional statement. Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27117 of 2019(2) dt.25-04-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Tekari (Panchanpur) P.S. Case No. 375 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T