Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50918/2017bail granted

Sonu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-18Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50918 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -246 Year- 2016 Thana -MALSALAMI District- PATNA ====================================================== Sonu Rai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyamal Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Malsalami P.S. Case No. 246 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that husband of the deceased is in custody. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Malsalami P.S. Case No. 246 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Patna City, Patna subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50918 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T