Sri Ansuman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27926 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-745 Year-2021 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== SRI ANSUMAN Son of Anil Kumar Resident of Kagzi Mohalla, P.S. - Siwan Town, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 745 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 409 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Siwan.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he got a tender of ambulances by using forged and fabricated documents and a committee constituted by the District

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27926 of 2022(4) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 Magistrate found him guilty for non-supply of ambulances. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the petitioner got tender of ambulances by using forged and fabricated documents. Witnesses have supported the prosecution version. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T