Satendra Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37141 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== SATENDRA SAH S/O MOTI SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-TAKIYA, WARD NO. 02, POLICE STATION-SASARAM (T), DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-02-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Informant of this case is ASI Mangal Singh, he got information that someone has fired upon himself with intent to commit suicide. He went to the house of the present petitioner. As per FIR, his wife Tara Devi, apprised the informant that the petitioner has attempted to commit suicide and he fired shot at himself. She apprised the reason that she was protesting her husband against his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37141 of 2021(3) dt.08-02-2022 2/2 illicit relation with another lady.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and this story has falsely been concocted as the petitioner is a politician and his opponent wants to ruin his career. He has also submitted that the wife of the petitioner has never lodged any case nor complained before any authority about the illicit relation of her husband, as such, this allegation is false and concocted. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No.

259 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.