← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2049/2023allowed

Munchun Yadav @ Pothiya @ Pothiya Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2049 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2022 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== MUNCHUN YADAV @ POTHIYA @ POTHIYA YADAV S/O BINDESHWAR YADAV @ VINDESHWAR YADAV R/O VillageMilkichak, P.S- Barbigha Keoti O.P., Distt.- Sheikhpura. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rameshwar Choudhary S/O Late Lakhan Choudhary R/O VillageKabilganj, P.S- Barbigha (Keoti O.P.), Distt.- Sheikhpura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 31.03.2023 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1st Sheikhpura in Bail Petition No. 465 of 2023 whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 504 of 2022 under Sections 341, 323, 325, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(i)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act was rejected.

As per allegation in the FIR, appellant has abused

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2049 of 2023(3) dt.24-08-2023 2/3 the informant's wife by taking her caste name and assaulted her because of she had not gone to harvest his paddy crops from the agricultural field.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. Injury is not on vital organ. He has not taken the cast name of the informant in public view. No offence is made out under the provisions of the SC/ST Act against them. Appellant is languishing in judicial custody since 23.01.2023. The appeal for bail is opposed by learned Spl. P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that there is general and omnibus allegation against the appellant, the Court is inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 31.03.2023 passed in B.P. No 465 of 2023 is hereby set aside.

The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Barbigha PS Case No. 504 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2049 of 2023(3) dt.24-08-2023 3/3 of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1st Sheikhpura.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma2203/- U