Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Paswan @ Parmod Kumar @ Parmod Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28035 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-810 Year-2022 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Paswan @ Parmod Kumar @ Parmod Paswan Son of Shiv Chandra Paswan @ Shivchandra Paswan Resident of Village - Sakri Chauki, P.S. - Arwal, Distt. - Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-05-2023 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 810 of 2022 dated 12.11.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner are that it is not clear from the FIR whether the petitioner himself delivered the alleged appointment letters which are alleged to be fake and the informant did not produce any proof of the alleged forgery regarding the said fake appointment letters and petitioner has fair and clean antecedent and has been languishing in jail since 13.02.2023 and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28035 of 2023(2) dt.25-05-2023 2/2 alleged offences of Sections 468 and 471 of IPC are not made out against this petitioner and there is no material or evidence to show the petitioner as to he being maker of the alleged forged appointment letters and after the petitioner's arrest, the police failed to recover any incriminating article from his possession and against him the investigation has been completed and there is no allegation against him of having tampered the evidence or witness during the investigation of this case. 4.

Learned APP for the State opposes the bail prayer of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the above submissions and mainly the petitioner's fair and clean antecedent and the completion of investigation against him, in my opinion, it is a fit case for bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of concerned Court in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 810 of 2022.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T