Jay Prakash Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8117 of 2025 ====================================================== Jay Prakash Chaudhary son of Late Sita Ram Chaudhary, resident of Mohalla - Pratappur, P.S.- Mehandiganj, Patna City, P.O. - Jhauganj, District - Patna, at present residing at Kali Mandir, nar Donbosco School, Ashiyana Digha Road, P.S. - Digha, District- Patna (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Secretary-cum-Home Commissioner (Home Police), Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Inspector General of Police (HQ), Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiv Sager Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Additional Advocate General (5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. This case has been listed under the heading "For Office Notes".

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the objection raised by the Office is not correct.

4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that the objection raised by the Office is correct as the proper remedy available to the petitioner is to file an MJC

Patna High Court CWJC No.8117 of 2025(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 application as direction has already been made to the petitioner to file a representation which according to petitioner, has already been filed.

5. Counsel further submits that for non-compliance of any order, the only remedy left to the petitioner is to file MJC application for willful disobedience of the order.

6. This Court finds that the objection raised by the Office is absolutely in accordance with law. As such, this Court without expressing any opinion on limitation, hereby disposed of the present writ application, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy considering the question of limitation also.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Anshuman/- U