← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17391/2014dismissed

Anup Kumar Sharma v. The Principal Secretary General Administration Deptt. Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

2022-12-01Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17391 of 2014 ====================================================== Anup Kumar Sharma S/o Late Lajdhari Sharma Resident of Village / Mohalla Goshi Tola, Naya Bazar, P.S. Lakhisarai, District Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Principal Secretary General Administration Deptt. Govt. Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Magistrate Lakhisarai.

3.

The District Compassionate Committee, Lakhisarai. 4.

The District Agriculture Officer, Lakhisarai. 5.

The Circle Officer, Suryajgarha, District Lakhisarai. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Pipariya, District Lakhisarai. 7.

Pankaj Kumar S/o Late Shankar Sah Resident of Village Nirpur, Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S. Suryajgarha, District Lakhisarai at present posted as Clerk, Sub Divisional Office, District Lakhisarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Raghawanand, GA 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022

1. The petitioner prays as under:

"1. That the petitioner prays for the following reliefs through the present writ application:- I. To issuance of an appropriate writ in nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ and declare the service of Pankaj Kumar is illegal and terminate from the service. II. To hold an enquiry that in what circumstances private respondent is serving in the government jon after making false forged and fabricated document and averment. III. To issuance of an order that enquire about the authority that in which circumstances son has been doing service on compassionate ground while the wife of deceased is live and in service.

IV. To any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be a entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Patna High Court CWJC No.17391 of 2014(3) dt.01-12-2022 2/2

2. This court would not enter into official enquiry relating to the educational qualifications and appointment process adopted. There is no specific allegation as against the respondent.

3. The writ petition is mis-concieved and is accordingly dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 42 U