Pushpa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6828 of 2024 ====================================================== Pushpa Kumari Wife of Ranjit Kumar Yadav, D/o Madhusudhan Yadav, Resident of Village and Post- Belsandi, Block and, P.S.- Bithan, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Bithan, District- Samastipur. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Bithan, District- Samastipur. 8.

The Headmaster, Utkarmit Madhya Vidyalaya, Parkauliya, Block- Bithan, District- Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suraj Narain Yadav For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel ( 15 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had already filed a representation before the respondent no.3 but till date no order has been passed. 3.

Considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of this order and other supporting documents,

Patna High Court CWJC No.6828 of 2024(3) dt.03-04-2025 2/2 before the respondent no.3 within a period of four weeks and the respondent no.3 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner and dispose of the representation of the petitioner after affording an opportunity of personal hearing or through her counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within one month from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner.

4.

It is made clear that respondent no.3 shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order. 5.

With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U