← Library
Patna High CourtC.Misc./476/2024disposed

Dilip Kumar @ Phulan Singh v. Ram Bihari Prasad Verma

2024-10-22Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.476 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Dilip Kumar @ Phulan Singh Son of Late Kunj Bihari Singh, Resident of Village Ansubabad, P.S. Barh, District Patna. 2.

Ashutosh Kumar son of Sri Awani Mohan Sharma, Resident of Village, P.S. and P.O. Pandarak, District- Patna.

3.

Mukesh Singh Son of Sri Laxmi Singh, Resident of Village, P.S. and P.O. Pandarak, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Ram Bihari Prasad Verma Son of Late Mahadeo Prasad, Resident of Gola Road, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna.

2.

Vivek Ranjan Son of Ram Bihari Prasad Verma, Resident of Gola Road, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna.

3.

Vishal Kumar Son of Ram Bihari Prasad Verma, Resident of Gola Road, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna.

4.

Smt. Tanuja Kumari Wife of Sri Om Prakash, Resident of Tekari Road, Pathar Ki Masjid, P.S. Sultanganj, P.O. Mahendru, District Patna. 5.

Abinash Kumar Sinha Son of Sri Yogendra Prasad Sinha, Resident of Sultanpur, P.S. Danapur, District Patna.

6.

Shivdani Singh Son of Late Dwarika Singh, Resident of Village Gopalpur, P.S. Akbarpur, District Nawada.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate Mr.Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate Mr. Natraj Verma, Advocate Mr. Lakhsami Kant Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 The record has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioners.

2. After making argument for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks disposal of the present petition with liberty to raise all issues before the learned trial court on

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.476 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 the grounds under which the order dated 15.02.2024 is being challenged before this Court.

3. In the light of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid.

4. Since it is an old matter of the year 1995, learned Sub Judge-VI, Danapur is directed to expedite Title Suit No. 115 of 1995 and take up the matter preferably on day-today basis and try to dispose of the same within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order without giving unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and the prayer for adjournment be dealt with strictly. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U