Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30246/2024bail granted

Rambali Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-20Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30246 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-723 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Rambali Yadav SON OF GOBARDHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GOGA, P.S.- MUFFASIL, DIST- GAYA 2.

REETA DEVI @ REETA DEVI W/O RAMBALI YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GOGA, P.S.- MUFFASIL, DIST- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aryan Singh, Adv.

For the Informant ;

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 723 of 2023 dated 02.07.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 304B read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the coaccused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. Five lakhs as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30246 of 2024(2) dt.20-05-2024 2/2 petitioner no. 1 is the father-in-law and the petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The petitioners neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioners. It is submitted that the petitioners used to torture the deceased on account of dowry.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gaya in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 723 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T