Nand Kishore Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45870 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2017 Thana -KASHICHAK District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Nand Kishore Singh son of Late Basudev Singh.
2. Sanjay Singh son of Nand Kishore Singh.
3. Laljit Singh son of Shedhwar Singh.
4. Jyoti Devi wife of Satyendra Singh.
5. Baby Devi @ Mukhiya Baby Devi wife of Dharmendra Singh.
6. Satyendra Singh son of Late Brij Kishore Singh. All resident of VillageBirnama, P.S. Kashichak District Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Kasichak P.S. Case No. 39/2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 354, 323, 308, 448, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Except petitioner no. 4 all the petitioners have criminal antecedent. Petitioner no. 5 has also criminal antecedent but she is a lady.
Considering the entire facts, let petitioner nos. 4 and 5 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45870 of 2017 (2) dt.10-10-2017 2/2 court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Kasichak P.S. Case No. 39/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. So far as petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 are concerned, since they have criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Shivaji Pandey, J.) Rakhi U T