Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45902 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh Son of Late Nand Kishore Singh,

2. Dinu Kumar Son of Arun Kumar @ Arun Kuamr Singh, Both resident of Village- Makrandpur, P.S.- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kr. Alok, Adv. For the Informant : Mr. Ravi Raj, Adv. For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 132 of 2017 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 325, 354(A), 354(B), 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation, in the night, the accused persons including the petitioners entered into the house of the Informant and started assaulting to him. Specific allegation has been made against the petitioner no.1 to have caused injury and petitioner no.2 has pointed the gun towards the Informant. In paragraph 13 of the case diary, it has been stated that an empty cartridge was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45902 of 2017 (2) dt.10-10-2017 recovered from the place of occurrence.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, above named, is rejected.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T