Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23290/2020bail granted

Himanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23290 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2020 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== HIMANSHU KUMAR S/o Biltu Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Resident of Village- Daniyalpur, Kumar Tola, P.S.- Teghra, Distt- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 506/ 504 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that he demanded Rs.2.5 lacs from his mobile phone from the informant for purchasing arms and then abused him by hurling filthy languages.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 4.3.2020 and nothing incriminating has come against him in the investigation to implicate him in the offence.

In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23290 of 2020(2) dt.15-09-2020 2/2 is allowed. Let the petitioner mentioned above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Teghra Police Station Case No. 34 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T