Dablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26602 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Dablu Kumar S/o Dhanik Sharma R/o Village - Ward No. 03, Itmadi, Beldaur, P.S - Beldaur, District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Parmatma Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2026 Heard Mr. Parmatma Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 10.12.2025 in connection with Nalanda (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 06.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant suspects that some unknown person misused her biometric and other documents to withdraw money from her bank account. It is further alleged that total Rs. 20,400/- has been withdrawn from her account.
2/4
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has been transpired during investigation. The petitioner has received Rs. 5,500/- (Rs. Five thousand and five hundred) into his bank account from the bank account of the informant. He further submits that altogether Rs. 20,400/- (Rs. Twenty thousand and four hundred) was withdrawn from the bank account of the informant. He further submits on instructions that the petitioner is ready to return the amount in question to the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is ready to return Rs. 20,400/- (Rs. Twenty thousand and four hundred) to the informant, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
3/4 satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif in connection with Nalanda (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall produce a demand draft of Rs. 20,400/- in favour of the informant, namely, Rekha Devi at the time of furnishing bail bond. Learned Court below is directed to hand over the said demand draft to the informant or her representative at the time of furnishing bail bond. ii. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
iii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
4/4 acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T