← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30900/2024allowed

Raju Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30900 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2023 Thana- PIYAR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Raju Manjhi Son of Vijay Manjhi Resident of Village - Rampur Dayal, P.S.- Piyar, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is a case of commission of murder of the informant's son namely, Manjay Kumar by the accused persons including the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30900 of 2024(2) dt.02-05-2024 2/3 implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The F.I.R. has been lodged after the delay of three days without any explanation. No one is the eye witness of the alleged occurrence. During investigation, no consistent material has come against the petitioner to show his complicity in the alleged occurrence. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31.05.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30900 of 2024(2) dt.02-05-2024 3/3 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Piyar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T