Rajesh Thakur @ Rajesh Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1802 of 2015 (10) dt.16-12-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1802 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -741 Year- 2013 Thana -MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictMADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Rajesh Thakur @ Rajesh Kumar Son of Ram Balak Thakur R/o Village - Kowari, P.S. - Sursand District - Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Puspanjali @ Seema W/o Rajesh Thakur R/o Kowari, P.S. - Sursand District - Sitamarhi, At present address D/o Ramanand Thakur, R/o Pirokhar P.S. - Madhawapur, District - Madhubani. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with C.R. No. 741 of 2013 (TR No. 4510 of 2014 for the offence registered under Sections 498A, 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner as well as the opposite party no. 2 is present in Chambers today.

On the last occasion, there was some talk of one time settlement but again this Court has tried its level best to seek a via media in which the dispute may be resolved. Various ways and means have been suggested to the petitioner. The opposite party

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1802 of 2015 (10) dt.16-12-2015 no. 2 has offered to cooperate in all respects but the petitioner is absolutely recalcitrant. He is neither concerned about her nor is he concerned about the welfare of the eight years old baby girl, who has come into this world, as a result of the present marriage. His approached towards his baby daughter is absolutely callous and he has tried to justify his action by leveling far-fetched allegations including the allegations that the opposite party no. 2 is mentally unsound. Such allegations and insinuation are highly deprecated by this Court. His conduct is thus, deplorable. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the interim order passed in favour of the petitioner is withdrawn and the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T