Md. Kalamul Haque v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13559 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Kalamul Haque S/O Late Md. Maududul Haque R/O House No. - A/3, Indirapuri Colony, P.O.- B.V. College, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna800014 (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary Department Of Personnel & General Administration, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna
4. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna
5. The Director, Secondary Education Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna
6. The Secretary , Department Of Finance, Government Of Bihar, Patna
7. The District Education Officer, Patna, District- Patna
8. The Headmaster, Sri Ram Govind Singh High School, Parsa, DistrictPatna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. M.P. Dixit & Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaubey, Advocates For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. N. Hoda Khan, SC-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 14-01-2015 The petitioner is unnecessarily flogging a dead issue with regard to additional claim of Earned Leave which he claims. He is entitled to adding up to about 72 days. From a perusal of the statements made in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13559 of 2012 (4) dt.14-01-2015 counter affidavit specially, paragraph-7 onwards and crystallized on paragraph-11, the entitlement of the petitioner in terms of the leave available to him under Earned Leave category has already been paid. The expectation of the petitioner for his claim for additional number of days is not born out from the stand of the State, which the Court finds to be reasonable and cogent as well as valid.
The writ petition is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) P.K./- U