Radhe Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13396 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -379 Year- 2017 Thana -SAUR BAZAR District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Radhe Ram, Son of Bhumi Ram
2. Amirika Devi @ Amrica Devi, Wife of Radhe Ram
3. Kanchan Kumari, Daughter of Birendra Ram All Resident of VillageBhada, P.S.-Sour Bazar, District-Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 379 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioners are of demand of dowry and causing the death of the deceased.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are father in law, mother in law and cousin sister in law and has nothing to do with the death of the deceased and no specific allegation has been attributed to them.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13396 of 2018 (2) dt.05-04-2018 2/2 on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 379 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T