Sugreev Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28256 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2021 Thana- AMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Sugreev Pandey, Son of Late Jogendra Pandey, R/O- Village- Basdohar P.S.- Lasliganj District- Palamu (Jharkhand) 2.

Prakash Singh, Son of Raj Kumar Singh, R/O- Village- Tandwan, P.S.- Tarhasi, Dist.- Palamu (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners fairly submits that the present application has been filed without verifying the facts that earlier a bail application had already been filed on behalf of the petitioners and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present application. A supplementary affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the deponent seeking apology for his conduct.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28256 of 2022(3) dt.18-08-2022 2/2 In view of the statements made in the supplementary affidavit whereby the deponent of the present case seeks unconditional apology in filing second bail application without making verification of earlier one, this Court allows the learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw the present application. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U T