Patna High CourtCWJC/18103/2011dismissed

Sabita Singh @ Savita Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-25Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18103 of 2011 ====================================================== Sabita Singh @ Savita Singh Wife Of Sri Mritunjay Kumar Singh Resident Of Shiv Chandra Banerjey Lane, Adampur Ghat, P.S.- Adampur, District Bhagalpur At Present Working As Assistant Teacher , C.M.S. Primary School Adampur, Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY CUM SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

2. THE SPECIAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION , GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR

6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BHAGALPUR

7. THE SECRETARY, C.M.S PRIMARY SCHOOL, ADAMPUR BHAGALPUR

8. THE HEADMASTER C.M.S PIMARY SCHOOL, ADAMPUR, BHAGALPUR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 25-06-2018 On 2.4.2012 when the case was called out, no one had appeared and as such the Court directed listing of the case in due course. After more than six years the case was listed for admission on 22.6.2018 when no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to assist the Court and under compelling circumstances in order to facilitate the petitioner to assist the Court the case was directed to be listed today. Even today also on call no one has appeared.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18103 of 2011 dt.25-06-2018 2/2 Under the aforesaid circumstances, the court has reason to believe that the petitioner has no interest remaining in the present case and as such no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to assist the court.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner in case of any subsisting grievance, to agitate the matter before the appropriate forum/Court in accordance with law notwithstanding the dismissal of the present writ petition.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NAFR Uploading Date 26.06.2018 Transmission Date