Husn Ara Khatoon @ Husan Ara Khatoon And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41857 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2017 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Husn Ara Khatoon @ Husan Ara Khatoon, W/o Sheikh Airuddin,
2. Sheikh Airuddin Son of Late Sheikh Sakur, Both R/o Village- Badhaiya Tola, P.S.- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ashma Khatoon W/o Abul Hassan, R/o village- Badhaiya Tola, P.S.- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 57 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-498A/34& other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
It has been submitted that petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the informant in a case which has been registered under Section-498A of the Indian Penal Code. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41857 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 57 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned In-charge, Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T