Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29252 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2021 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar Son Of Suresh Singh R/O Village- Dawil, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 49803 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2021 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Arun Singh @ Arun Kumar Singh S/O Late Parmeshwar Singh R/O Village - Dabil, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 29252 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhav Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 49803 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surya Kant Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, it is a case of abduction of the son of the informant by the petitioner and other accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29252 of 2022(4) dt.08-12-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioners have not played any role in abduction of the victim and the victim has been recovered from the house of one Anil Singh and not from the house of these petitioners and this fact has been stated in para-16 of the case diary. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that from perusal of the case diary witnesses have supported the case of the prosecution. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Jamui in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 156 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T