Patna High CourtCWJC/20836/2011dismissed

Kanhaiya And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-02Mr. Justice Vikash Jain1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.20836 of 2011 (11) dt.02-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20836 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Kahaiya, son of late Narendra Prasad Singh,

2. Bandana Wife of Sugandh Kumar Singh, D/o late Narendra Prasad Singh Residnet of Village and P.S. Barail, P.S. Parsarma, District- Supaul.

4. Archana Singh wife of Manoj Kumar Singh ,D/o late Narendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Nurchak, P.S. Bisfi, DistrictMadhubani

5. Smt. Uma Singh wife of late Narendra Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla New Balbhadrapur, Rama Nand Path, P.S. and P.O. Laheria Sarai, District Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Collector, Darbhanga, DistrictDarbhanga.

2. The Certificate Officer, Darbhanga, District Darbhanga.

3. The Additional Collector, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga

4. The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga

5. The State Bank of India, Darbhanga Branch through the Branch Manager, Darbhanga, P.O and P.S. Laheriyasaria, town under District Darbhanga.

6. Jitendra Pd. Singh S/O Late Shyam Sundar Singh R/O Mohalla- New Bahadurpur Rama Nand Path, P.S.-Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga

7. Bimal Devi widow of Kirendra Prasad Singh 7(a) Navin Kumar Singh Son of late Kirendra Prasad Singh 7(b) Bipan Kumar Singh Son of late Kirendra Prasad Singh 7(c) Pravin Kumar Singh Son of late Kirendra Prasad Singh, All Resident of Mohalla New Balbhadrapur, P.O. and P.S. Laheriyasarai, District Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : None For the SBI : Mr. Kaushalendra Kr. Sinha, Adv For the State : Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, AC to GA 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-07-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls.

2. The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U