Anil Yadav @ Chunna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28153 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2026 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Anil Yadav @ Chunna Yadav S/o Late Dinanath Yadav Resident of Mohalla - Barmasia, Ward No. 12, P.S - Nagar Sahayak, District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Balkrishna Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nagar Sahayak P.S. Case No. 245 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and later Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act was added.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has made firing at the door of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that no such occurrence has happened and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28153 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that the articles were presented by the informant herself. No recovery was made by the police. He further submits that no one has received any injury. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.02.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of four cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Katihar in connection with Nagar Sahayak P.S. Case No. 245 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T