← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7784/2022dismissed

Umesh Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7784 of 2022 ====================================================== Umesh Narayan Singh S/o Late Shyamfal Singh, R/o Sheikhpur, Umesh Nagar, P.S. District-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Engineer-in-Chief -cum-Additional Secretary-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Work Divsion-01, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh (GA-2) Mr. Binay Kr. Pandey, AC to GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. (i) To issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing upon the respondents to exempt the petitioner from appearing in the departmental examination and thereafter make the payment three consecutive increment with effect from 01-07-2012 to 31-012015.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7784 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2024 2/2 (ii) To direct the respondents to revise the pay scale of the petitioner and revise the pension on the basis of last pay drawn.

(iii) To direct the respondents to make the payment of arrears of difference of salary as well as pension.

(iv) To direct the respondents to make the payment of penal interest with regard above mentioned dues on account of delay and latches on the part of respondents."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondents authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U