Ful Kumari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32429 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2023 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== 1.

Ful Kumari Devi Wife Of Ramjee Sharma Resident Of Village - Sidhauli (OLD), P.O. And P.S. - Dalmiya Nagar, District - Rohtas 2.

Chitranjan Sharma @ Chitranjan Kumar Son Of Ramjee Sharma Resident Of Village - Sidhauli (OLD), P.O. And P.S. - Dalmiya Nagar, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nidhi Kumai Sharma @ Nidhi Sharma Wife Of Aditya Kumar Sharma, Daughter Of Satyendra Kumar Vishwakarma Resident Of Village - Lebura, Ward No. 1, P.O. - Banjari, P.S. - Rohtas, District - Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 206/2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 147, 148, 341, 323, 379, 307, 354 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the D.P. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the informant mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32429 of 2024(2) dt.23-05-2024 2/2 5 lacs and a scooty as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners who are mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the complainant. The petitioners neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the complainant. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 206/2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T