← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27050/2025bail granted

Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Sonkar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-30Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27050 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Anil kumar @ Anil Kumar Sonkar S/o Late Lakhan Sonkar R/o vill and Mohalla - Sager, ward no. 39, P.S.- Sasaram (Town), Distt.- Rohtas (At present), Permanent Address - 18/207 Kanshi Ram Ram Awash (Gotana), P.s.- Mugalsarai (Chandaulti), Distt.- Varanashi (U.P) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 65 litres of liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27050 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 that petitioner has not concern with the vehicle in question. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T