Chanarik Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50514 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -547 Year- 2017 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Chanarik Rai, Son of Late Kuldip Rai,
2. Ram Nirekhan Rai, Son of Chanarik Rai,
3. Gupta Rai Son of Chanarik Rai, All are R/o Naya Tola, Saguna, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Danapur P.S. Case No. 547 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 120B & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
It has been submitted that specific allegation of causing fire-arm injury to the brother of the informant is against Prem Ratan and Arjun.
From the written report, it appears that there is no specific allegation against these petitioners.
Counsel for the informant has appeared and opposed the prayer.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50514 of 2017 (3) dt.14-11-2017 2/2 allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Danapur P.S. Case No. 547 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T