Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28010/2022bail granted

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Kumar Vinodia v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-19Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28010 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2021 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD KUMAR VINODIA SON OF MUNILAL SINGH R/O VILLAGE- GOSHPUR, P.S.- DALSINGHSARAI, DISTRICTSAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, Tata pick-up an bearing registration No. BR 21 GA 3369 was taken away by the five unknown miscreants on the gun point and in the said vehicle total 2500 kg mango was kept.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28010 of 2022(2) dt.19-09-2022 2/2 the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. As per the seizure list, the said vehicle was recovered near the house of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 14.07.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 15806 of 2022. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below, Begusari in connection with Teghrha P.S. Case No. 203 of 2021.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T