Patna High CourtC. REV./27/2016dismissed

Most Renu Kuer v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-24Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.27 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19349 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Most Renu Kuer Wife of Late Jhagaru Mahto resident of village - Mananpur Purwari Tola, Police Station Kalyanpur, District - East Champaran, Motihari .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Commissioner - Cum - Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Deputy Director (Primary Education ), Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Motihari, East Champaran

6. Block Development officer, Kalyanpur Block, District - East Champaran

7. Block Education Extension Officer, Kalyanpur Block, District East Champaran

8. The Circle officer, Kalyanpur Block, District East Champaran at Motihari

9. Chulhai Rai Son of Deonandan Bharihar, Ex - Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat - Shishwa Kharar, Kalyanpur Block, District East Champaran at Motihari

10. Bhagalu Prasad Son of Shukhlal Bharihar, Present Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat - Shishwa Kharar, Kalyanpur Block, District East Champaran at Motihari .... .... Respondents-Opp. parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Dwivedi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar SC-33 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 24-02-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioner and SC-33 for the State.

The application seeks review of the order dated 24.11.15 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 19349 of 2011. On going through the said order, it appears the Court considering the nature of the issue raised therein declined to entertain the same in writ

Patna High Court C. REV. No.27 of 2016 (2) dt.24-02-2016 2/2 jurisdiction. The claim was raised in the writ petition on the basis of a decision/resolution of the government.

If that be so, the petitioner may ventilate her grievance before the appropriate forum/authority. The petitioner cannot be granted re-hearing of the matter in the garb of review. Considering the narrow confines of the jurisdiction invoked by the petitioner, I am not persuaded to allow the application. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U