Md. Sonu @ Sahnabaz v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57614 of 2015 (3) dt.08-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57614 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -117 Year- 2012 Thana -PIRPAINTI District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Md. Sonu @ Sahnabaz Son of Sheikh Rustam, Resident of VillageGovindpur, P.S.- Pirpainty, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pirpainty P.S. Case No. 117 of 2012 pending in the Court of CJM, Bhagalpur for the offences instituted under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in short is that the informant is the driver of truck and the truck was loaded with chili and was coming from Pirpainty (Shermari) Bajar. The Khalasi and other coaccused persons were also in the truck and when they reached near Makrandpur, the criminals coming in a Scorpio stopped the truck and kidnapped them and tied them from towel and left them in bush and in the morning they united themselves and informed the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57614 of 2015 (3) dt.08-03-2016 police.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The mother of the petitioner had filed a complaint case against local police officers and he has falsely been implicated in the present case.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the number of witnesses have supported the prosecution case which is evident from perusal of the impugned order itself and investigation is in progress against the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the above named petitioner on anticipatory bail, the same is rejected.

Anyhow, if the petitioner surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order and, if possible, the same may be disposed of on the same day.

(Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T