Sunita Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1259 of 2012 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19074 of 2011 ======================================================
1. Sunita Kumari Daughter Of Nandi Mandal Resident Of VillageLaxmipur, Police Station- Laukahi, District- Madhubani
2. Meera Kumari Wife Of Vishnudeo Mandal Resident Of VillageLaxmipur, Police Station- Loukahi, District- Madhubani
3. Amli Kumari Wife Of Ram Nandan Mandal Resident Of VillageMansapur, Police Station- Laukahi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Appellants.
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani, District- Madhubani
4. The District Superintendent Of Education-Cum-District Programme Officer, Madhubani, District- Madhubani
5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Laukahi Block, Laukahi, District- Madhubani
6. The Panchayat Secretary, Mansapur Gram Panchayat, Laukahi DistrictMadhubani
7. Mukhiya, Mansapur Panchayat, Laukahi, District- Madhubani
8. Ram Kumar Yadav Son Of Ram Swaroop Yadav Resident Of VillageBehea, Police Station- Laukahi, District- Madhubani
9. The Principal, Primary School, Laxmipur, Laukahi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Respondents.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellants : Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Shyam Kishor Sharma, GA3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 02 20-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the State.
Having gone through the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge, we are not inclined to interfere in the
Patna High Court LPA No.1259 of 2012 (02) dt.20-02-2015 - 2 - matter.
The writ petitioners/appellants were allegedly appointed as Shiksha Mitra. In the year 2006 all working Shiksha Mitra were absorbed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. They first time vindicated their grievance in the year 2011, i.e., five years after the aforesaid conversion. The learned Single Judge has refused to interfere in the matter. We are not inclined to take a different view of the matter.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Trivedi/- U