Anshu Ram @ Anshu Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42328 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Anshu Ram @ Anshu Kumar, Son of Nunu Ram @ Nanu Ram,
2. Sunu Ram @ Ritesh Kumar Son of Rambachan Ram,
3. Sitesh Ram @ Sitesh Kumar Son of Rambachan Ram,
4. Bindeshwar Ram Son of Late Ramaashish Ram, All R/o Village- Khabra, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kaushik For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-01-2018 At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner no. 2 has already been arrested, hence he is not pressing the present petition on behalf of petitioner no. 2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar PS case no. 184 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 354, 379, and other sections of Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is assaulting
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42328 of 2017 (4) dt.10-01-2018 2/2 the informant and his wife resulting in grievous injury to the informant and death of the wife of the informant. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the petitioners, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on anticipatory bail. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on account of land dispute.
The learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. The learned APP for the State, upon perusal of the case diary, has submitted that the post mortem report would show that there are multiple injuries on the person of the deceased and it is the collective action of the accused persons which has resulted in injury to the informant and his wife resulting in death of the wife of the informant.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merit in the present petition and hence, the same is dismissed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J.) rinkee/- U T