Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19393 of 2015 ====================================================== Amit Kumar S/O Shri Jitendra Prasad Yadav, Resident of Maharajpur, P.OPokhariya, P.S.- Ranipatra, District- Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Range Education Officer, Purnia.

5.

The District Education Officer, Purnia.

6.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Purnia. 7.

The BLock Education Extension Officer, Barhara Kothi Block, DistrictPurnia. 8.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Lakshmipur, Block- Barhara Kothi, District- Purnia.

9.

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Lakshmipur, Block- Barhara Kothi, District- Purnia.

10.

Chandan Kumar Jaiswal, son of : Yogendra Prasad Jaiswal, village and Post Mahikhand, 11.

Prabhas Kumar Yadav, Son of: not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Lakshmipur, P.S- Barlaha Kothi, District- Purnia. 12.

Ranjan Kumar Bharti, son of : not known to the pettitioner, Panchayat Lakshmipur, P.S Barlaha Kothi, District- Purnia. 13.

Ranjan Kumar, son of : not known to the petitioner, Panchayat Lakshmipur, P.S- Barlaha Kothi, District- Purnia.

14.

Mukesh Kumar, son of : not known to the pettitioner, Panchayat Lakshmipur, P.S.- Barlaha Kothi, District- Purnia. 15.

Kumar Jyotish son of : not known to the pettitioner, Panchayat Lakshmipur, P.S.- Barlaha Kothi, District- Purnia.

16.

Madhubala Jaiswal, son of : not known to the pettitioner, Panchayat Lakshmipur, P.S.- Barlaha Kothi, District- Purnia. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vaibhav Narayan For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Binita Singh, SC 28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2024

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19393 of 2015(4) dt.30-04-2024 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this writ application due to lack of instruction from his client inasmuch as he has lost contact with his client.

3. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √